DeSantis Convinces No One

hot air2 In: DeSantis Convinces No One | Our Santa Fe River, Inc. | Protecting the Santa Fe River in North Florida

Following is a prime example of the Gainesville Sun’s recent warning in their newspaper:  “Get Past Platitudes on Water Supply.”  Republican gubernatorial candidate Ron DeSantis is making lots of noise about the environment, but everything we know about him suggests it is hot air.

Check out Gillum’s background, compare to DeSantis, and make your choice.  We know which one you will pick if you are concerned for our environment.

Choose wisely to protect our springs and rivers.  This is extremely important.  So much rides on putting good people in political positions, and the opportunity does not come every day.

Our state is in an abysmal condition regarding water because of uncaring, corrupt politicians who put money before natural resources.  We have several good environmental candidates in this mid-term election, and we mentioned some in yesterday’s post — please make sure to learn about them and vote.

Read the original article here in Florida Politics.

Comments by OSFR historian Jim Tatum.
-A river is like a life: once taken, it cannot be brought back-


 

Ron DeSantis proposes bans on fracking, offshore drilling; Democrats skeptical

Republican gubernatorial candidate Ron DeSantis rolled out environmental proposals, a key component of his general election messaging, on Wednesday.

DeSantis’ plan includes Everglades restoration, along with protection of beaches, the state’s water supply (including the use of reclaimed water), parks, springs, and air.

Among the proposal’s highlights: advocacy for a fracking ban and opposition to offshore drilling.

DeSantis distinguished himself in the Republican primary with attacks on the sugar industry, which heavily invested in the campaign of his main opponent, Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam.

However, DeSantis’ plans seem to represent more a continuation of current environmental policy than any sharp breaks.

Regarding the Everglades, the DeSantis plan contends that southern storage on Lake Okeechobee will fix current issues, which include algae blooms and massive fish kills.

“DeSantis is committed to completing the suite of Everglades Restoration projects in the Central Everglades Planning Process (CEPP) and Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP),” the plan asserts.

“Beginning day one, DeSantis will work with the Trump administration and Congress to ensure the federal government honors its 20-year old funding promise to CERP by appropriating its $200 million in matching federal dollars to build the Southern Reservoir and complete the entire suite of projects,” the plan adds.

DeSantis also intends to continue the raising of the Tamiami Trail and having the Department of Environmental Protection assume complete oversight of water quality standards.

DeSantis also vows to stand against offshore oil drilling, with commitments to “smart growth” and flood mitigation efforts.

“DeSantis will utilize his unique relationship with President Trump and his administration to ensure that oil drilling never occurs off Florida’s coastlines,” the plan declares.

(Those with memories going back months will recall the back and forth between Gov. Rick Scott and Sen. Bill Nelson about assurances that Florida was “off the table” for offshore drilling, with no ultimate clarity provided on that issue even now).

As well, he will work for solutions to the “unprecedented red tides” in Southwest Florida, with a task force of “experts in the field of marine and oceanic science.”

DeSantis’ water conservation proposals include the use of “reclaimed water,” which will “be treated consistent with its use.”

As well, he vows to push a fracking ban through the Legislature.

DeSantis also wants to use Amendment 1 dollars for restoration of current conservation lands in addition to acquisition: “vital springs protection funding, Everglades restoration funding, beach restoration funding, various water quality funding, and conservation of our state parks.”

One of his key endorsers, Fleming Island Sen. Rob Bradley, has advocated for better use of those dedicated funds, which often have not gone for their express purpose.

Florida Conservation Voters noted last year that since Amendment 1 passed in 2014, no year has seen more than $15.2 million earmarked for Florida Forever. This is a contrast between pre-2009 funding levels of $300 million a year and is a small fraction of the more than $2 billion set aside via the Amendment 1 real estate tax since 2014.

Additionally, DeSantis vows to work with “local stakeholders and utility companies” regarding air quality standards.

With DeSantis having spent the last two weeks digging his way out of self-imposed controversies, including the now-infamous suggestion that attacking Gillum could “monkey up” the state’s progress in the Rick Scott era, it’s clear that he’s now pivoting to policy.

With a $10 million ad buy coming in for him via the Republican Governor’s Association, the expectation is that the campaign will be less about gaffes and more about policy proposals.

However, Democrats and environmentalists are skeptical of DeSantis’ commitment to the environment.

Florida Conservation Voters Executive Director Aliki Moncrief asserted that DeSantis’s plan “read like he’s applying to be branch manager … a yes man … for the Trump Administration.”

The national League of Conservation Voters gave Moncrief [sic] a 2 percent rating for his work in Congress, a mark “remarkably difficult” to attain, said Moncrief.

DeSantis “said that climate change is not a problem the state can handle,” which Moncrief called a “ludicrous” statement.

“DeSantis wants to rearrange the furniture while the house is falling down,” Moncrief said.

Ahead of DeSantis’ Cape Coral campaign stop, John Scott, Vice Chair of the Sierra Club Calusa Group, called DeSantis “a sham environmentalist who has consistently done the bidding of Florida’s biggest polluters … gutting clean water protections, allowing corporations to pollute our water, and supporting Donald Trump, Rick Scott and Scott Pruitt’s attacks on our environment.”

1 Comment

  1. Single issue voters are political sheep led to slaughter–it is the totality of an agenda that is important! Radical, self-acclaimed environmentalists (if that’s really what they are) don’t seem to get it. Don’t be dazzled by empty rhetoric, expose the “wizard” behind his single-issue curtain! Vote wisely, or not at all!

Back to top
Skip to content