OSFR Writes New Op-Ed With Sabal Trail Pipeline Concerns

Leesburg1workcopy2Andrea Grover, spokesperson for the  Sabal Trail/Spectra pipeline project, recently published a very misleading article in several newspapers in Florida and Georgia.  She failed to mention many negative aspects of this project and OSFR has written a rebuttal pointing out these facts.  Her article can be read HERE,  and our op-ed, which has been submitted to the Orlando Sentinel, the Suwannee Democrat, the Moultrie  Observer and the Sumter News  follows:

SABAL TRAIL’S SPOKESPERSON DISTRIBUTING LARGE QUANTITIES OF DISINFORMATION

“Safety, public input, federal monitoring, jobs, tax revenue, exceed federal safety requirements, reliability, affordable, clean, thorough review, latest proven technologies:”   these are all good little meta tags and nice sounding words and phrases used by Andrea Grover, public relations employee for Sabal Trail, in her recent editorial about that company’s proposed natural gas pipeline which was carried by newspapers in the southeastern United States.

But let us point out a few facts that this editorial fails to mention.  There were plenty of public input meetings (we attended seven of these, and we read the minutes from others) and the input was overwhelmingly negative.  Issues of concern include lack of adequate insurance, poor safety record, forceful takeover of private land, destruction of wildlife and the environment, and danger to springs and rivers. Among dozens of testimonies, a mere three favorable citizens’ comments were heard

The product to be transported through the proposed pipeline is the result of hydraulic fracturing or fracking.  This extraction technique involves injecting sand and chemicals into underground wells.  Three members of Congress, Henry Waxman, Edward Markey, and Diana De Gette contend that millions of gallons water containing hazardous chemicals, 29 of which are known or suspected human carcinogens, were injected into wells from 2005-2009.

These chemicals poison the well water and sloppy extraction techniques may result in the methane leaking from the pipes in the wellbore , which can contaminate the surrounding aquifer.  According to recent studies, these leaks increase greenhouse gases (which contributes to global warming) sufficiently to counteract the “clean” qualities of natural gas, thus reducing its desirability over coal as an energy source.

Fracking is now unquestionably tied to earthquakes, as described in recent articles in Science Magazine and the U. S. Geological Survey.  From 2000 through 2008 in Oklahoma, there were six earthquakes of magnitude three or higher, but since fracking arrived, there were 850 in just a 15 month period in 2010-2011, and this year, from January to May, the count is 145.

Frequent quakes in Texas, Arkansas, and Ohio, have resulted in the latter two states putting bans on fracking because “They’d rather forego some of the potential economic effects of oil companies in their states to avoid a potential disaster invoking human lives.” (Washington Post article by Dominic Basulto, July 15, 2014)

Gas pipeline accidents are frequent and constant: a recent Wall Street Journal review (Jan. 20, 2014) found that there were 1,400 pipeline spills and accidents in the U.S. from 2010-2013. Even though Grover stresses safety, her company has a safety record that is worse than terrible.   At one point it received the largest fine ever for safety violations.

Sabal Trail/Spectra Energy has been responsible for $8,000,000 in property damage (according to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration), it has been fined $15,000,000 for spills at 89 pipeline sites, and  it has been deemed to have a “poor maintenance and monitoring record.”

Grover brags about the virtues of natural gas, pointing out that it produces 45 percent less carbon dioxide than coal and 30 percent less than fuel oil.  She fails to mention that it produces 100 percent more than solar or wind power, and that this is fracked gas, and the havoc it wreaks on our aquifer.

What else does she fail to mention?  Well, that in the scoping meetings it came out that Sabal Trail does not have adequate insurance and will not be responsible for fighting fires, clearing wreckage, hauling bodies to hospitals, etc. when their pipe blows up; instead the local, well-equipped-for-huge-mega disasters emergency units like we have in Bell and Branford will have to do it.

And that the gas will most likely be exported to foreign countries, even though unwilling landowners will have their land taken away under the guise of eminent domain;  that the “open access” pipeline has the blessing (and permits) of federal agencies to sell the gas to other companies for export after it reaches its terminal in south Florida.

Back to top