Unauthorized Dam Is IllegallyTrespassing On Public Land

rodmanmill-creek-k-chadwick*

And the public (except for a few bass fishermen) wants it gone.  Thanks to Florida Defenders of the Environment, maybe our non-feasing government will correct their error and tear it down.  Another example of our agencies which do nothing unless prodded by lawsuits.

The Gainesville Sun published this article on Dec. 6, 2016.  Go to this link to read the entire article.

*photo by Karen Chadwick

Comments by OSFR historian Jim Tatum.
-A river is like a life:  once taken, it cannot be brought back-


rodman2

RODMAN RESERVOIR

Proponents all-in to remove dam

By Lloyd Dunkelberger

The News Service of Florida

TALLAHASSEE — Reviving a decades-old fight, environmentalists have begun a legal push to remove the Rodman Dam in North Florida and restore the Ocklawaha River.

FDE Color [Converted]
FDE Color [Converted]
In an administrative challenge filed Monday with the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, members of the Florida Defenders of the Environment asked the federal government to enforce the terms of an agreement that came after Congress deauthorized the Cross Florida Barge Canal in 1990.

The dam, built in 1968 near Palatka and formally known as the George Kirkpatrick Dam, remained in place on federal land in the Ocala National Forest under a series of permits that have long since expired, said Jane West, a St. Augustine lawyer who filed the litigation. She said the last action came in 2010 when the U.S. Forest Service directed the state Department of Environmental Protection to seek to renew the dam permit, which never happened.

rodman4

“Years later, the agencies have been muddling along with no clarity, no delineation of responsibilities, and quite frankly, an outright unauthorized trespass of publicly owned land,” West said.

Former Gov. Buddy MacKay, who wrote the legislation that killed the canal project while he was a member of Congress in 1990, said he supports the dam’s removal.

“It’s an absolute outrage that everything that has been done and we still have this dam,” MacKay said. “There’s no reason whatsoever to do this. In fact it’s a bizarre situation.”

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Bruce Kaster, a Florida Defenders of the Environment member and former officer in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Joseph Little, another member of the environmental group and law professor emeritus at the University of Florida.

Kaster, an Ocala lawyer, said the proponents of restoring the Ocklawaha River and removing the dam have been too “conciliatory” in their approach and are now taking a more aggressive legal stance.

“This is just one prong. We’re going full tilt right now,” said Kaster, explaining other federal lawsuits may be filed.

rodman3

Most of the debate over the removal of the Rodman Dam has taken place in the political arena, where North Florida lawmakers, including Kirkpatrick, a longtime senator, and former state Senate President Jim King, over the years successfully blocked efforts to remove the dam and related structures.

Newly elected lawmakers, including Sen. Keith Perry, R-Gainesville, and Rep. Bobby Payne, R-Palatka, support keeping the dam and the related 9,200-acre Rodman Reservoir, a major bassfishing attraction.

Environmental groups have long called for the dam’s removal and the restoration of the Ocklawaha, which is a major tributary to the St. Johns River.

West said the state would save more than a $1 million a year that it now spends to maintain the dam.

She also said the dam removal would add to the water flow of the St. Johns and revive more than 20 natural springs in the area, where water flow is suppressed by the presence of the Rodman Reservoir.

Anne Harvey-Holbrook of the Save the Manatee Club said her organization supports the dam removal because it would allow better access to “warmwater habitats,” like Silver Springs, that manatees use in the winter.

Supporters of the dam and the Rodman Reservoir cite a list of reasons to keep the existing system, including the economic benefit of a large bassfishing water body.

Kaster and other environmentalists say the loss of the bass fishing would be offset by new economic activity related to the restored river system and new recreational facilities.

“There is plenty of flat water in North Florida for me to fish that I’m happy with,” said Kaster, who is a fisherman. “But there is only one Ocklawaha River.”

10 Comments

  1. What locals? What public? What I have learned in the past year and a half from the “locals” (whether or not they fish), the “public” (except for a few busybody environmentalists!) want the Rodman Dam and the Reservoir to remain intact.
    Years ago I also saw the Rodman Dam as an abomination, but having seen it in
    today’s light of its evolved and highly productive aquatic environment, I agree
    with the Rodman supporters that the current ploy to breach the dam is neither biologically, economically, nor legally justified.

  2. You have no clue what the residents who are immediately affected by this dam want we want to keep the Dam and guess what I’m not one of those few bass fisherman you might want to edit that you, go talk to some locals then come talk to me

Back to top
Skip to content