Florida’s Water Seems Free For The Taking — At A Cost To The Rest Of Us

Featured Upcoming Events

No event found!

View All Events

The following article was sent to us via email, but is believed to have come from the Miami Herald on May 26, 2017 even though we could not find it online.

Comments by OSFR historian Jim Tatum.
-A river is like a life:  once taken, it cannot be brought back-

BOB IMAGE In: Florida’s Water Seems Free For The Taking — At A Cost To The Rest Of Us | Our Santa Fe River, Inc. (OSFR) | Protecting the Santa Fe River

The Southwest Florida Water Management District voted to cut the flow of freshwater springs that feed Crystal River. Good for developers. Bad for the river. floridastateparks.org

Carl Hiaasen

May 26, 2017 7:03 PM

Florida’s water seems free for the taking — at a cost to the rest of us


[email protected]

Here’s a government agency that sucks.


Act NOW!*

Put the Right to Clean Water Amendment on the 2022 ballot


Last week, the Southwest Florida Water Management District voted to cut the flow of the famed freshwater springs that feed Crystal River and Kings Bay by up to 11 percent. Billions and billions more gallons will be diverted to benefit developers.

That’s major suckage from the springs, and plenty of people showed up at the SWFWMD meeting to speak against it. Still, board members voted 9-1 to rob the flow.

This sort of sellout has been happening at water districts throughout Florida since Gov. Rick Scott packed the boards with pro-development and pro-Big Agriculture surrogates.

It’s the same reason that the South Florida Water Management District, which oversees water policy in the southeastern part of the state, is now basically a public-relations arm of the sugar industry.

Over on the west coast, the SWFWMD (sometimes known as Swiftmud) insists its computer models show that the Crystal River and 70 springs of Kings Bay won’t be damaged by more groundwater pumping.

The agency says its findings were submitted for scientific peer review and found to be “thorough, scientifically reasonable and based on the best available data.”

Lots of folks who live there don’t believe it. They’ve seen the clear springs change in alarming ways as the flow has been choked to provide more water for development.

Craig Pittman of the Tampa Bay Times reports that residents of Crystal River and Kings Bay are encountering algae blooms, pollution, and even the appearance of saltwater fish and barnacles, never a good sign in a freshwater river.

While the iconic manatees still gather by the hundreds there, attracting tourists from all over the world, the water quality is declining.  The Florida Springs Institute says Swiftmud’s computer models overlooked the obvious long-term damage from a worsening trend: Ground pumping in that area has increased from 401 million gallons a day in the 1960s to about 965 million gallons a day in the current decade.

Siphoning Florida’s public springs to enrich private industry doesn’t bother policy makers in Tallahassee. Bottled water companies, for example, are encouraged to help themselves to our aquifers.

The Nestle corporation, which markets Zephyrhills and other popular brands, spent a measly $230 for a permit to suck almost 1.5 million gallons daily from the Blue Spring in Madison County.

Worried about the threat of dangerous droughts, the staff of the local water management district argued for a reduction in the amount of water Nestle would be allowed to take. State officials sided with Nestle and even offered tax breaks for its bottling plant, which opened in 2004.

The company has said it deserves to get all that precious spring water for free, because it’s a good neighbor and job provider.

Ironically, while Nestle is allowed to continue this massively lucrative suckfest, Florida officials are pursuing a costly lawsuit against the state of Georgia, alleging that it diverts too much water from the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint rivers.

The result has been serious downstream damage to Apalachicola Bay, impacting oyster and seafood production.

Because, duh, that’s what often happens when you screw around with a natural water supply, whether it’s a river or an underground spring.

The Crystal River controversy arose because a 2016 law requires water districts to set “minimum flows” for all Florida springs. As you would expect from Scott appointees, the levels being set allow generous water diversions to accommodate future development.

The Florida Defenders of the Environment and other groups are suing the St. Johns River Water Management District challenging the low flow levels approved for Silver Springs, another treasure and landmark tourist destination.

The lax new Crystal River rule could end up in court, too, and it should. Any data presented as “science” by politicized water boards deserves intense scrutiny, because the stakes are so high.

We think of Florida’s fresh springs as eternal, but in truth they can be polluted, salt-infused and sapped to a relative trickle by exploitative pumping. While the consequences might not be as visually distressing as dead oyster beds in Apalachicola Bay, it’s the same moral crime, born of the same greed.

So the governor is suing Georgia for doing the same thing to Florida rivers that he’s doing to Florida springs. Can you bottle hypocrisy?

1 Comment

  1. SWFWMD went with their “science” even though the observations of about fifty residents (for the Rainbow River, and about thirty more for the Crystal River) contradicted what their model was telling them. And scientist Dr. Robert Knight of the Florida Springs Institute demonstrated for them that the model was flawed, and explained why it was flawed, and they just blindly went with their “science”. And yet they had the nerve to express indignation that a couple of speakers suggested that they were answering to the governor’s request for water for development.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top
Skip to content